<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>dev.webonomic.nl</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dev.webonomic.nl/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dev.webonomic.nl</link>
	<description>Developing websites and their discontent</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:08:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t do Evil</title>
		<link>http://dev.webonomic.nl/dont-do-evil</link>
		<comments>http://dev.webonomic.nl/dont-do-evil#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Webtechnology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.webonomic.nl/?p=482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AKA the day I stopped using Google. I don&#8217;t like the new policy of Google by pushing other services, like Google + to any Google account. It seems that I have a Google website now as well. The day I started Google I can&#8217;t exactly recall, must be back in the 90&#8242;s, at least it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://dev.webonomic.nl/dont-do-evil/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to disable CSS transforms, transistions and animations</title>
		<link>http://dev.webonomic.nl/how-to-disable-css-transforms-transistions-and-animations</link>
		<comments>http://dev.webonomic.nl/how-to-disable-css-transforms-transistions-and-animations#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CSS3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Webtechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[css]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.webonomic.nl/?p=809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sick of too much eye-candy and is your browser slowing down due to all the shiny and inappropriate animations? What don&#8217;t you disable all the CSS3 animations, CSS3 transforms and CSS3 transitions with one click and speed up your browsing experience! Put this in your User-CSS stylesheet: Now you can check with one mouse click [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://dev.webonomic.nl/how-to-disable-css-transforms-transistions-and-animations/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Google’s Chrome Reduced Pagerank a penalty (II)?!</title>
		<link>http://dev.webonomic.nl/is-google%e2%80%99s-chrome-reduced-pagerank-a-penalty-ii</link>
		<comments>http://dev.webonomic.nl/is-google%e2%80%99s-chrome-reduced-pagerank-a-penalty-ii#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 12:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.webonomic.nl/?p=1026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually I doubt if there is any real penalty. Probably Google will advertise more; that will raise the bidding for adds on `browser` keywords. So Microsoft has to pay more for there adds for Internet Explorer 9 on the Google pages. It might benefit Google eventually . IMHO the complete bidding system for adds is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://dev.webonomic.nl/is-google%e2%80%99s-chrome-reduced-pagerank-a-penalty-ii/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Google’s Chrome Reduced Pagerank a penalty?!</title>
		<link>http://dev.webonomic.nl/is-google%e2%80%99s-chrome-reduced-pagerank-a-penalty</link>
		<comments>http://dev.webonomic.nl/is-google%e2%80%99s-chrome-reduced-pagerank-a-penalty#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 11:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Webtechnology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.webonomic.nl/?p=1016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Advertising on your own pages isn&#8217;t likely to cost a lot of money, so &#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://dev.webonomic.nl/is-google%e2%80%99s-chrome-reduced-pagerank-a-penalty/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple&#8217;s refusal for adding Flash to iPad/iPhone has nothing to do with battery usage.</title>
		<link>http://dev.webonomic.nl/apples-refusal-for-adding-flash-to-ipadiphone-has-nothing-to-do-with-battery-usage</link>
		<comments>http://dev.webonomic.nl/apples-refusal-for-adding-flash-to-ipadiphone-has-nothing-to-do-with-battery-usage#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 11:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Webtechnology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.webonomic.nl/?p=904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Off course it was a brilliant marketing trick, everyone started writing about it and discussing the issue. It even made a Dutch Newspaper define Adobe Flash as one of the losers in 2011. Which is one reason that triggered me to publish this post now, it has been a draft for nearly a year. Alas, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://dev.webonomic.nl/apples-refusal-for-adding-flash-to-ipadiphone-has-nothing-to-do-with-battery-usage/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nominate Git(hub) for the Nobel Peace Prize</title>
		<link>http://dev.webonomic.nl/nominate-github-for-the-nobel-peace-prize</link>
		<comments>http://dev.webonomic.nl/nominate-github-for-the-nobel-peace-prize#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 11:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Webtechnology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.webonomic.nl/?p=993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Git is a decentralized or distributed revision control system. This means every programmers work together in a team, localized, but every team-member  owns the complete code, it&#8217;s back-upped everywhere, not just on one place. Git has increased the speed and ease of development for open source projects enormously. Every one can contribute and pull requests [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://dev.webonomic.nl/nominate-github-for-the-nobel-peace-prize/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>History pushState issues</title>
		<link>http://dev.webonomic.nl/history-pushstate</link>
		<comments>http://dev.webonomic.nl/history-pushstate#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 14:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Webtechnology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.webonomic.nl/?p=982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Opera 11.60 broke navigation on our main website. It does not longer because I added a workaround. It&#8217;s all related to setting the baseURI (wrongly) after ajax loading and history.pushState To see the problem: Open this page in Opera 11.60: http://www.webonomic.nl Click internet Inspect any element and readout the baseURI property, it&#8217;s set to While [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://dev.webonomic.nl/history-pushstate/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why I use Opera as my main browser</title>
		<link>http://dev.webonomic.nl/why-i-use-opera-as-my-main-browser</link>
		<comments>http://dev.webonomic.nl/why-i-use-opera-as-my-main-browser#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 15:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.webonomic.nl/?p=906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, I use it since the Phoenix Alpha&#8217;s but the main reason is&#8230; Because it has the shortest vendor-prefix: -o-]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://dev.webonomic.nl/why-i-use-opera-as-my-main-browser/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The beauty of WebGL</title>
		<link>http://dev.webonomic.nl/the-beauty-of-webgl</link>
		<comments>http://dev.webonomic.nl/the-beauty-of-webgl#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 09:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Webtechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webGL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.webonomic.nl/?p=878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have seen some demo&#8217;s with fishtanks and aquariums, but I found a much more elegant showcase here. It stresses the beauty of infinity and brings focus to the relationship between simplicity and complexity, often found in nature. You can see the working example here: http://wakaba.c3.cx/w/escher_droste.html]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://dev.webonomic.nl/the-beauty-of-webgl/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Browser performance and CPU load</title>
		<link>http://dev.webonomic.nl/browser-performance-and-cpu-load</link>
		<comments>http://dev.webonomic.nl/browser-performance-and-cpu-load#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 12:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Webtechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Javascript]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.webonomic.nl/?p=858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chromium is using 2 cores and Opera isn&#8217;t running full speed on Sunspider JS benchmark. That is the outcome of a simple test running TOP while taking the sunspider benchmark on a quadcore (AMD 630) Ubuntu 64 machine with the three main browsers: Chromium, Firefox and Opera. Opera 11.11 is surprisingly never using more then [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://dev.webonomic.nl/browser-performance-and-cpu-load/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

